Start with the region where your target is located to avoid unnecessary cross-region detours.
Global locations and route selection
Choose an exit by destination, route type, and actual use case. YsVPN covers Asia-Pacific, North America, Europe, and other regions, with support for Windows / macOS / iOS / Android / Linux and no limit on simultaneous devices.
- No email address required
- Sign up with a username and password
- 60-day no-questions-asked refund
Explore global routes by region
The table below shows common exit regions, cities, and route types. The Streaming column indicates that a route may support content access in the corresponding region, but libraries, account regions, platform rules, and exit detection can change. Test the actual target platform in your client before connecting. Temporary latency, load, and user counts are omitted so short-term conditions are not mistaken for long-term quality.
In popular regions, compare IEPL, relay, and direct route types.
Choose separate exits for computers, tablets, and other supported platforms based on use.
| Country or region | City | Route type | Streaming |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASIA PACIFIC · Asia-Pacific | |||
| Singapore | Singapore | IEPL | Supported |
| Hong Kong, China | Hong Kong | IEPL | Supported |
| Japan | Tokyo | IEPL | Supported |
| Japan | Osaka | Relay | Supported |
| South Korea | Seoul | Relay | Supported |
| Australia | Sydney | Direct | Confirm by platform |
| NORTH AMERICA · North America | |||
| United States | Los Angeles | IEPL | Supported |
| United States | San Jose | Relay | Supported |
| United States | Seattle | Direct | Confirm by platform |
| United States | New York | Direct | Confirm by platform |
| Canada | Vancouver | Relay | Supported |
| Canada | Toronto | Direct | Confirm by platform |
| EUROPE · Europe | |||
| United Kingdom | London | IEPL | Supported |
| Netherlands | Amsterdam | Relay | Supported |
| Germany | Frankfurt | Relay | Supported |
| France | Paris | Direct | Confirm by platform |
| Switzerland | Zurich | Direct | Confirm by platform |
| Sweden | Stockholm | Direct | Confirm by platform |
| OTHER REGIONS · Other regions | |||
| United Arab Emirates | Dubai | Relay | Confirm by platform |
| India | Mumbai | Direct | Confirm by platform |
| Türkiye | Istanbul | Direct | Confirm by platform |
| Brazil | São Paulo | Direct | Confirm by platform |
| South Africa | Johannesburg | Direct | Confirm by platform |
| New Zealand | Auckland | Direct | Confirm by platform |
Route types and cost differences
Route names are not simply tier labels. IEPL, relay, and direct connections use different access paths, with different fits for network conditions, destinations, and cost structures. To assess a route, consider the quality of the entry point, exit region, application characteristics, and performance over continuous use—not just its name.
IEPL
Prioritize stable pathsIEPL focuses on organizing a dedicated path between the access side and the overseas exit. Compared with ordinary public-internet direct connections, it reduces uncontrolled public-network hops and is better suited to sustained transfers, video meetings, code repository synchronization, cloud document collaboration, and session-based work. In noticeably unstable network conditions, IEPL is usually the first type worth testing.
Dedicated-route resources generally cost more to build and maintain, so they are often deployed in high-demand regions. Still, confirm that the exit region matches the target service instead of assuming that “dedicated” overrides geographic distance. For content in Japan, start with a Japan exit; for a UK business system, test a UK exit first. Regional matching is usually more important than pursuing a route label alone.
Relay routes
Optimize the entry pathA relay route sends the connection to a suitable access point first, then forwards it through a relay path to the target region. Its value lies in reorganizing the entry path and avoiding poor direct routing between the local network and the remote exit. For cross-region access, evening instability, or unreliable local carrier routes, a relay route is often more worth trying first than a standard direct connection.
More relays do not necessarily mean a better path. An effective relay reduces uncontrolled steps and keeps transmission between entry and exit more coherent. For nearby destinations, a relay may provide a steadier experience; for distant targets, compare different relay entry points and check page loading, video seeking, and persistent connections against your actual needs.
Direct routes
Prioritize regional coverageDirect routes connect to the target exit over public-network paths. Their structure is relatively straightforward, making them useful for extending coverage to less-served regions and for web browsing, research, and temporary regional access where connection continuity is less critical. Performance depends more heavily on the local network, public cross-border routing, and the target data center’s region, so results can vary significantly across networks.
The cost structure of direct routes is generally better suited to expanding regional coverage, allowing less frequently used exits to be included in the directory. Use them as regional matching tools: identify the region required by the target service, then test the corresponding direct exit. If page responses become unstable during continued use, switch to a relay in the same region or a nearby route rather than repeatedly reconnecting to the same exit.
How to understand route costs
Route costs depend not only on the exit server, but also on access resources, cross-border transmission paths, relay scheduling, and ongoing maintenance. Dedicated routes invest in path stability, relays improve routing between entry and exit, and direct routes are better for broad regional coverage. These differences appear in available regions, routing options, and plan resources, but they should not be reduced to “higher price always means higher speed.”
A more useful approach is to keep the target and task consistent: test candidate routes with the same website, video segment, or work task, and note initial page load, continuous loading, seek recovery, and persistent-connection interruptions. Keep the local network unchanged so you can distinguish route issues from local access or platform issues.
Route selection tips by use case
Start by asking “Where is the target?” and then consider “What does the task require from the connection?” One route does not need to serve every purpose. With multiple devices, connect each platform to a more suitable exit; there is no limit on simultaneous devices, making it easier to separate work, streaming, and everyday browsing.
Everyday browsing
For everyday websites, research, and community reading, start with geographic distance and page response. When a site has no strict regional requirement, try a nearby exit first, then compare relay and direct routes in the same region. Nearby routes are generally easier to control and reduce unnecessary cross-region transmission.
If a page opens but images, scripts, or the login state fail to load fully, stay in the same region and switch route types. This helps determine whether the issue comes from a particular exit path instead of changing both region and route at once.
Streaming and content delivery
Streaming is primarily affected by the content library’s region, so the exit must match the region where the target content is available. For Japan-based content, start with a Japan exit; for UK content, start with a UK exit. A successful connection only confirms that a network path was established—it does not guarantee that the platform will provide the expected content. Account region, platform rules, and exit detection also affect the result.
During testing, do more than check whether the homepage opens: play content, seek through it, and switch between content pages. If playback buffers frequently, switch from direct to relay or IEPL within the same region. If the library does not match, verify the exit region first instead of repeatedly refreshing the player.
AI Tools
AI tools often involve sign-in, long-form generation, file uploads, and persistent sessions. Prioritize connection continuity and keep the exit region stable. Frequent switching between countries may affect sign-in status, regional detection, or session flows, so avoid changing routes mid-task once you find one that works.
If a page is accessible but generation stalls, test an IEPL or relay route in the same region before clearing account data. For file uploads, first rule out local wireless instability by checking whether ordinary websites and other services also disconnect, then decide whether to change routes.
Gaming connections
Gaming is more sensitive to path fluctuations and continuous data transfer. Start with an exit near the game server, then test IEPL or relay routes. Choosing only by account region may be inaccurate because the account region, matchmaking region, and actual game-server location may differ. Confirm the server region used by the game before selecting a route.
Use different routes for updates and live matches when appropriate. Updates prioritize sustained transfer, while matches depend more on stable input response. If voice chat is fine but the match fluctuates, or the match is stable but downloads are slow, test separate routes rather than forcing all traffic through one exit.
Remote work
Video meetings, code hosting, cloud documents, and remote desktops typically require persistent sessions. Start with an IEPL route in the region where the target service operates, and keep a relay in the same region as an alternative. Avoid frequent exit changes during work to prevent active uploads, sign-in sessions, or remote connections from being re-established.
If an enterprise system restricts sign-in regions, follow your organization’s access rules and keep the exit region aligned with business requirements. In a multi-device setup, keep the work computer on a fixed work exit while other devices use everyday routes, reducing interference from streaming or downloads.
Decision order for switching routes
Effective troubleshooting depends on fixed variables. Change only one factor at a time—region or route type—so you can tell whether the adjustment helped. Repeatedly switching without a plan changes browser cache, platform state, and network paths at once, making the cause harder to identify.
-
Confirm the access target
First identify the target service, content region, or business system’s location. If the target has a regional content library, match the exit region to it first; otherwise, start with a nearby exit.
-
Keep the local network fixed
Keep the current access method unchanged during testing; do not switch back and forth between wireless and other networks. Confirm that ordinary websites work normally before comparing international routes.
-
Compare route types in one region
Within the same region, test IEPL, relay, and direct routes in sequence, and observe whether the actual task completes continuously. Do not judge only by route names or substitute a single page load for sustained-use testing.
-
Keep a tested alternative
Prepare another route type for frequently used regions. When the current path is affected by local-network or public-routing changes, switch directly to an alternative exit that has already been tested.
How to understand global coverage
“90+ countries / 200+ routes” describes the overall scale of regions and routes; it does not mean every country uses the same access method. Popular regions typically offer multiple paths for different access networks and use cases, while less-served regions focus on providing a selectable exit for access with a specific regional requirement.
Country and route counts cannot directly represent the user experience. Multiple city exits broaden regional choice, but the real test is whether the target matches, the connection remains continuous, and the application completes its task. For a fixed use case, a small set of verified everyday routes is usually more efficient than browsing the entire directory repeatedly.
The client supports Windows / macOS / iOS / Android / Linux. Accessing the client and subscription requires the user panel; no email address is required, and a username and password are sufficient. Different devices can use different exits by purpose, with no limit on simultaneous devices.
Pre-connection checklist
Which exit region does the target service require?
Does this task prioritize connection continuity or regional coverage?
Have you tested another route type in the same region?
Can the local network access ordinary websites normally?